I would like to mention that, for example, the programmers responsible for 'technical systems' are humans, the people responsible for improving rules are humans, and therefore the logical status of the main messages in this article remains diffuse. I further expect, that if a single person or few risk management people without technical, human, innovational skills decide on static rules to follow in all aspects of life, human responsibilty for fatal events should be - anyway - very close to 100%.